Post by iainofcourse on Aug 19, 2015 12:18:33 GMT
Here is the thing, last Saturday eve, me and Jamie were discussing a role play campaign that would be exceedingly difficult to orchestrate, pull off, and play.
the idea was to have a HORUS HERESY era based role play where there would 18 "sub GM's" and 1 "overall GM".
the 18 would be the primarchs of the heresy, and the 1 would be the emperor (this would need to be a VERY experienced GM)
each "primarch" would have a group of about 6-10 players, and would be on a separate mission from the others (or not if the "sub GM's" band together) in which they might try to raise armies of "normal people" manipulate, infiltrate, obliterate the other primarchs ranks of "soldiers", and eventually the "primarch" themselves.
also maybe one person in each group may be a named character from the heresy era (kharn, abbadon, ect).
what would people say to EVER being a possibility? (not like i am saying I'D ever take part in this degree of insanity)
the idea was to have a HORUS HERESY era based role play where there would 18 "sub GM's" and 1 "overall GM".
the 18 would be the primarchs of the heresy, and the 1 would be the emperor (this would need to be a VERY experienced GM)
each "primarch" would have a group of about 6-10 players, and would be on a separate mission from the others (or not if the "sub GM's" band together) in which they might try to raise armies of "normal people" manipulate, infiltrate, obliterate the other primarchs ranks of "soldiers", and eventually the "primarch" themselves.
also maybe one person in each group may be a named character from the heresy era (kharn, abbadon, ect).
what would people say to EVER being a possibility? (not like i am saying I'D ever take part in this degree of insanity)
